Opinion: Don't weaken National Park gun rules

Monday, March 03, 2008

By Pete Hart

National parks are special places that enjoy the highest level of protection provided to public lands by Congress. Originally, the U.S. Army, and since its creation in 1916, the National Park Service (NPS), have continually worked to protect park resources and to inspire park visitors.

The Bush Administration, in response to intense political pressure orchestrated by the National Rifle Association, has just announced it will re-open the regulations governing firearms in our national parks. This brings up serious issues for park rangers, visitors, and wildlife.

Poaching and resource degradation have been problems since Yellowstone was set aside as the world’s first national park in 1872. In 1936, to address this issue, the Secretary of the Interior issued the first rules regarding firearms in national parks. The regulations prohibited anyone from carrying a gun within the parks unless they obtained written permission from a park officer and the weapon was sealed. The main objective of this rule was to protect park wildlife from poaching and to provide rangers with an enforcement tool.

In 1970, Congress declared that superlative natural, historic, and recreation areas should be managed as one seamless National Park System. In 1983, during the Reagan Administration, park regulations were modified to apply to all park areas in the system. Firearms were allowed in national park areas as long as they were unloaded and stored out of easy reach. In those 60 park units where hunting is authorized, hunters are permitted to carry firearms during open hunting season.

The current firearm regulations have been in place now for 25 years. In my over 38 years as a park ranger and a park manager, these regulations were developed with full public input and have worked very well. The only clamor for change has come recently from the political arena. Crime in national park areas remains considerably lower than in surrounding communities, but when poachers, drug traffickers, and other serious offenders are caught inside the parks, the current firearms restrictions add further weight to the government’s prosecution of criminals. A person’s failure to comply with the simple requirement of properly stowing a weapon can be an indication to rangers that something might be amiss.

Changing the regulations could open up some of the most remote parkland in the contiguous 48 states, including backcountry areas in Yellowstone, Glacier, and Grand Teton to people with any type of legal firearm. Increasingly, urban based visitors find themselves out of their comfort zone while enjoying their national parks. With that said, reasonable precautions such as bear awareness programs, food storage enforcement, and the carrying of pepper spray by backcountry users have reduced bear encounters. If firearms are added to the equation, unintended results could be devastating to the individual, other backcountry users, and wildlife.

Like our military reservations, veteran’s hospital grounds and other controlled federal installations, firearms and their use have long been restricted in our nearly 400 national park areas. To travel through the entrance station of a national park is to enter a special place. Long time NPS employee Bill Brown in his book, Islands of Hope (1971), characterized national parks as “sanctuaries of nature, as landmarks of history and culture, and as places of contemplation, discovery and adventure.” He goes on to say that there is another quality, an ambience of shared sociability and pleasure in these welcoming, neutral lands. Relaxing firearms regulations in the parks will be detrimental to this refuge ideal that national parks have come to signify for American families over the last century.

Our national park sites vary from Yellowstone to Independence Hall and from Glacier to the Lincoln Memorial and Shiloh battlefield. They are meant to be special places of inspiration and education with a sense of tranquility, history, and beauty. The current regulations, which allow guns in parks with reasonable restrictions on how they are carried, have been working for many years. They protect the safety of humans and wildlife but do not unduly infringe on gun ownership rights. The existing regulations do not limit the rights of law-abiding citizens any more than luggage searches or metal detectors at airports or federal buildings. Re-opening these regulations for review is unnecessary, and any proposed relaxation of these rules should be shot down.

Pete Hart has served as a protection ranger, chief ranger and superintendent of some 17 national park areas from Grand Teton and Glacier to Cape Cod and Great Smoky Mountains for over 38 years. He is currently a member of the Northern Rockies Regional Council of the National Parks and Conservation Association and lives in Livingston.

PERMALINK:
Opinion: Don't weaken National Park gun rules | Planet JH News Article: General News

Reader Comments

Guns don't kill people. People with guns kill people. Keep the NRA the hell out of my National Parks!
John R. Hall

While neither the U.S. Forest Service nor the National Park Service keeps precise statistics about crime on federally protected lands, officers and rangers say that crime appears to be on the rise in the backcountry. Between 2002 and 2007, there were 63 homicides in national parks, 240 rapes or attempted rapes, 309 robberies, 37 kidnappings and 1,277 aggravated assaults, according to National Park Service statistics. The article can be found here: www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2008/02/28/GR2008022800363.html Statistics of people harmed in national parks by crime or wildlife are not justification for carrying guns, sure. I carry a gun with me every day, everywhere I go. I don't shoot people, or have any intention of shooting people. Most people wouldn't guess that I have a gun. I don't carry it because I'm going somewhere dangerous and I'll need it, I carry it because I am responsible for my own safety. If you want to trust your safety and your life to a Ranger miles away, be my guest. No one is forcing anyone to carry a gun or even visit the Parks. If your life means so little to you that you would turn over your most effective means of defending it to a stranger that you most likely wouldn't be able to call to for help anyway, go right ahead. Notably, the Supreme Court stated about the responsibility of police for the security of your family and loved ones is "You, and only you, are responsible for your security and the security of your family and loved ones. The only person responsible for your safety is you. You feed yourself, clothe yourself, keep yourself sheltered, and keep yourself alive. No one else is responsible for this. That is why I carry a gun, because no one else should have to run to my rescue. It's the same thing in a national park. I want to go to the park and enjoy myself, have a good time with my family, roast some hot-dogs and enjoy the outdoors. I want to do it without fear of bears, cougars, rapists or murderers, and I don't want to have to wait three hours for a park ranger if I find myself in danger (and without cell phone reception). It's not because I want to be able to go shoot up our national parks, it's just because I want to be able to enjoy myself without putting myself in a helpless position. I'll take responsibility for my own safety and that of those who are with me, thanks. If you think our Nat'l Parks are safe havens, free from crime and bastions of peace and harmony with nature, you obviously don't get out much. Just ask Julianne Williams, Carole Sund, daughter Juli, Silvina Pelosso and Laura Winans. Oh wait, you can't. They were murdered in a National Park!
Bill Starks