Common sense capitalism
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
By Gary Trauner
As a businessman and financial manager, a recent story about Northwest
Airlines’ emergence from bankruptcy got me thinking about the plight of
everyday working Wyomingites and the balance, or lack thereof, in our
economy.
This story brings to mind United Airlines and so many others before it:
a poorly run company enters bankruptcy, breaks its written commitments
to its employees, puts the burden of these retirement commitments on
our government, and reorganizes.
And upon emerging from bankruptcy, we find, as in the case of
Northwest, the very people who ran the company into the ground stand to
receive stock worth nearly $300 million, while the employees who built
the company and conceded to reduced pay and benefits in an effort to
save the company stand to get back roughly 20 percent of what they gave
up.
Many “conservatives” call for increased personal responsibility,
including toughening our nation’s bankruptcy laws. However, these same
folks don’t seem to have a problem when a large corporation declares
bankruptcy, unloads the pensions it promised to its workers (in
writing) on the federal government, continues to pay its executives
obscene amounts of money and is allowed to continue in business. This
is hypocrisy of the worst kind.
While speaking to a local group of successful businessmen recently, I
was asked, “If our GDP is growing, household income is up and
unemployment is down, what is wrong with our economy?
In most recoveries, individuals see the lion’s share of gains through
higher wages and income. In this “expansion,” the tables have been
turned – corporate profitability and executive pay are the big winners,
with individual wages stagnant, and even falling in some cases. In
fact, the only reason household incomes are up is because people are
either working longer hours, taking on multiple jobs or their spouses
went to work as well.
So, regular people don’t earn any more while the price of energy,
education and healthcare soar through the roof. My question back to
this businessman was, “What good is a growing economy if the vast
majority of people, most of them hard-working, continually lose
ground?” Interestingly, the room was silent – I received no
answer.
Abraham Lincoln spoke of a government “… of the people, by the people
and for the people.” Government does have a role in helping us to
achieve economic balance, or as I call it, “common sense” capitalism.
Seems to me that the economic focus of government should be:
-To provide a level playing field for all businesses;
-To ensure that business plays by the rules; and, most importantly,
-To ensure that government truly honors the constitutional right of
each citizen to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” by making
sure our economic system works for all people, not just those at the
top.
In a 1932 speech, Franklin Delano Roosevelt noted that while powerful
groups often claim to oppose a strong government role in the nation’s
economic life, they almost always seek government’s protection for
their own interests. He argued that government’s task was to intervene
“not to hamper individualism, but to protect it” by helping the less
powerful confront abuses of the system by the powerful. In the words of
FDR, “The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the
abundance of those who have much, it is whether we provide enough for
those who have little.”
I also subscribe to a maxim set forth by another former President,
Ronald Reagan, who said “trust but verify.” We need reasonable yet
meaningful regulation and oversight of our markets, institutions and
businesses in order to promote our economic system yet ensure
compliance. The most dangerous threat to our economic way of life is a
loss of confidence and trust in our system by consumers and investors.
We can start by extending responsibility and accountability to business
and their managers. We should balance employee gains with corporate and
executive gains. We should promote policies that benefit everyone, such
as healthcare for all. Fiscally sound retirement plans and protection
of consumer rights would be a good start. Let’s pursue “common sense”
capitalism.
PERMALINK:
Common sense capitalism | Planet JH News Article: Left Wing Local
|
No comments for this Article.
|
Leave a Comment