Opinion

Orwell was right

Thursday, January 29, 2009

By Bob Stuart

A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing, either in the popular press or in the highbrow periodicals.
- George Orwell

In last week’s News&Guide, Todd Wilkinson takes aim at scientists and others who disagree with global warming alarmists. Titled “Climate change deniers gave us market collapse,” he also makes the outrageous claim that “those who insisted the world economy cannot afford to reduce carbon emissions are the same voices whose ideology led to a world economy now in ruin.”

Oh my God!

Wilkinson doesn’t identify the culprits, but implies that liberty, free market capitalism, and John McCain supporters are to blame for both global warming and our economic ruin. “Millions of Americans are living with the consequences of their Libertarian economic conceit,” he said.

First, let’s recall that John McCain was fully onboard the global warming bandwagon. “I will make global warming a priority,” he said.
Second, our economic crisis is not a result of free-market capitalism, but of its destruction by a government, enabled by the Federal Reserve, that prints, spends and borrows money vastly beyond its means. And as for liberty – as government grows, it shrinks.

Wilkinson’s Op-Ed resembles most articles on climate change by defending the alarmists and denigrating their opponents. The use of the word “denier” is particularly offensive and inflammatory, as it’s meant to conjure up images of Holocaust deniers, and stifle debate.

The fact is, hundreds of highly credentialed scientists are opposed to the science and scare tactics of the UN IPCC and their minions. In December, 650 scientists put their name to a US Senate report challenging the IPCC contention that there’s a scientific consensus, and are speaking out against the UN’s climate change position. Sadly, that story wasn’t covered in the popular press.

Al Gore and his cause can’t be dismissed, Wilkinson said, “by invoking cryptic countervailing anecdotes.” That is true, but they can be by invoking hard science. Try icecap.us and junkscience.com for opposing viewpoints, and climatedebatedaily.com for a side by side presentation of both sides of the issue.
Wilkinson (and Gore, et al.) claims that the “burning of fossil fuels,” specifically carbon dioxide emissions, cause climate change. Global warming alarmists have gone so far as to label carbon dioxide (C02) a pollutant. Let’s see what a prominent climate scientist has to say about it:

“Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant but a naturally occurring, beneficial trace gas in the atmosphere. There is no empirical evidence that levels double or even triple those of today will be harmful, climatically or otherwise. As a vital element in plant photosynthesis, carbon dioxide is the basis of the planetary food chain – literally the staff of life. Its increase in the atmosphere leads mainly to the greening of the planet. To label carbon dioxide a ‘pollutant’ is an abuse of language, logic and science.” – Robert M. Carter, Ph.D., Professor of Environmental and Earth Sciences, James Cook University.

Wilkinson invokes none other than James Hansen and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies to defend his cause. They recently claimed that October of 2008 was the hottest October on record. Unfortunately (for them), they were caught using September temperatures and claiming they were October’s.

The London Telegraph also reports that, in 2007, Hansen was forced “to revise his published figures for U.S. surface temperatures, to show that the hottest decade of the 20th century was not the 1990s, as he had claimed, but the 1930s.”
So, what’s the motivation for controlling C02 emissions and thereby energy? Concentrating wealth and power in the hands of global elites and further eroding national sovereignty – “global problems need global solutions.”

And what’s the solution? Carbon taxes, cap and trade schemes and billions of dollars thrown at a non-existent problem that will further cripple our economy and hurt especially the poor and middle class.

There are real environmental crises Wilkinson and others should be addressing. Access to clean water for millions of the world’s poor is one of them.

Orwell was right, but the truth is out there, and if enough people find it, truth and sanity may yet prevail. PJH


PERMALINK:
Orwell was right | Planet JH News Article: Right Wing Local

Reader Comments

Wow, how refreshing! Thank you Planet for publishing this article. It is nice to see an article written in a rational manner without making crazy allegations based on an alarmist's junk-science. I thought Al Gore's propaganda film was a moot point at this point? Are there still people that believe man-caused global warming is a big problem? If so, we certainly need to add philosophy 101 (logic) to our high school curriculum as well as a brief overview of the scientific method! I love Floy Lilley's brief & simple presentation, The Fraud of Global Warming, free for audio download at Mises Institute website: http://mises.org/media.aspx?action=author&ID=1124 I encourage you to publish more articles based on science rather than peer-reviewed propaganda... it is refreshing!
Shepard Humphries

Whoohooo!! This is just terrific. Nice to see a breath of fresh air! I agree with this article 100%! Excellent job pointing out the Goddard study and how they had lied in their findings about readings. The carbon tax, and everything is a scam like you said; to transfer more wealth to the world elite. Our freedoms are disappearing and people aren't paying attention. Instead they believe whatever Uncle Sam tells em' or see on the propaganda mainstream media about "global warming." In my humble opinion, Mother Earth is going through a cycle. She has had Ice Ages, as late as the 70's. To quote Mark Twain: "There's always a hole in theories somewhere, if you look close enough." You hit it right on the head in this article!
Lance Ripplinger

The phoniness of the global warming scare is old news to anyone who has been listening to factual science, rather than to hysterical "science." I don't know what makes some people so, well, stupid. Even more puzzling is how they get politicians to go along with their hare-brained "solutions." I suppose it has something to do with insanity, "Methinks the whole world's crazy, excepting me and thee, and sometimes thou art a little strange."
Susan Gore

Hey your last name is Gore. That's ironic.
Bryant

Hey Al, how many Polar Bears have died? Hey Al, how many people have left islands like Tutu? Hey Al, has the hockey stick graph been discontinued because it was a fraud? Have thecomputer models you base everythign on been proven wrong? Hmmmm You sir, are a fraud!
C. M.

The original opinion and this one by Bob Stuart are of no value whatsoever to the public. Neither provide a balanced overview of the subject. Neither are scientific opinions. More to the point: nothing makes man so important that he has to be on this planet--so what if the planet burns up? It will at some point (either the sun burns it up--or the second coming). It will probably freeze over too, at some point. Money spent studying and fighting global warming might be better spent educating children; providing health care to those without (3rd world and at home); providing a stable food/water source for the world's poor; fighting evil doers who rob the world of life. It's nice to have clean air, land, and water. It's nice to use renewable energy so that oil revenues don't end up in the hands of our enemy. It's nice see the world's glaciers providing fresh water to 500 million people in China. You might protect the resources you need to survive, but it might come at the expense of a better life just to ensure the survival of man.
eyeson jackson

RE: ......."....... Second, our economic crisis is not a result of free-market capitalism, but of its destruction by a government, enabled by the Federal Reserve, that prints, spends and borrows money vastly beyond its means. And as for liberty – as government grows, it shrinks. ......"...... There is no such thing as "free-market capitalism". A free market does not exist, never has, never will. Additionally, a small or non-existent government means no collective freedom since there is none to protect our collective economic interests and lives. There are no laws to ensure liberty, freedom, or democracy. Government must have considerable size to ensure the things the nation values. Of course, too much government isn't good either.
eyeson jackson

Blaming the voters for the economic collapse---they put the people in charge who are supposed to regulate and monitor our economic health. The FR played a SMALL part. Blaming them is like blaming a gun for a murder instead of the person who pulled the trigger.
eyeson jackson

RE "Sadly, that story wasn’t covered in the popular press." YES IT WAS.
eyeson jackson

Scientific opinion on climate change : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change ..... ...... .... Robert_M._Carter: ...... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._Carter ...... .....
eyeson jackson

RE: ......."A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing, either in the popular press or in the highbrow periodicals." ........................ Seems like both sides of this debate have been heard. The CC debate has been going on for a long time and the reason we haven't done much of anything is that both sides of the debate have played out fairly. The "popular media" (whatever that is) doesn't have much pull these days. If CC doubters can't get into "highbrow periodicals" then maybe they need to figure out why only lowbrow publications will publish their views and make some changes to their media PR team or message.
eyeson jackson

One does wonder just what the USA would look like if the political left wasn't fighting for the protection of the environment and the health of the public. One problem with the political left on the Global Warming issue is that there are many other pressing needs---an example was pointed out above: millions of people go without clean water everyday. Even if the “Global Warming problem” needed "fixing", the costs may not be worth it. As clearly illustrated above, the political right hasn't been convinced that Global Warming is real (man-made or not) and that something needs to be done about it and can be done about it. The left sees this as another act of stupidity by folks who would rather destroy the environment for profit than profit from a healthy environment. Ain't always so.
eyeson jackson

The political right has historically been the party against all things GREEN if those things hampered commerce or political careers. GWB's stance against California's emission standards is just one example out of thousands. Profits-trump-pollution to some. The costs exceed the benefits to others. The left sees the political right's motto as “Get yours while you can”. Wall Street---30 billion in bonuses in 2007, 18 billion in 2008---had no problem taking bonuses and then bailout money (and vice-versa) as they built, and then were destroyed by, a house of cards. To the political left, the right appears much like Wall Street: all too happy to have someone else pay for and fix GREEN problems in the future while they rake in the money. The left sees that as building a house of cards. It's easy for the political left to question the motives of the Anti-Global Warming crowd.
eyeson jackson

......Darwin was right, not Orwell....... The Republican Party is waking up to the idea that they may be out of touch—politically and scientifically. They just anointed a African American to head their political arm; they are scaling back their attacks on immigrants; Conservative Christians are backing more protections for the environment. GWB even protected the largest swath of land and water since we became a nation (OK, I may be wrong there....but it's close). Their mistake may be to embrace change to win political favor. Conservatives made that mistake when they controlled congress and spent money like it was a renewable natural resource. The issues surrounding Global Warming aren't black and white. I, for one, don't think we should waste time on the most common solutions offered to date because I don't think the benefits outweigh the benefits of addressing other issues. Protecting the environment is important but adapting to changes (cooling/warming) may be more useful than trying to prevent them. ....... Darwin was right, not Orwell.
eyeson jackson

eyeson jackson, did you enjoy the 25-minute speech at http://mises.org/media.aspx?action=author&ID=1124 ? I am interested in your feedback!
Shepard H



Leave a Comment


Write a Letter to the Editor
Please limit your letter to 300 words, sign it and give us the name of your town.

Wednesday, February 08
TODAY'S EVENTS
Music
Karaoke
9:00 PM
at the Virginian Saloon.
Music
Jackson Hole Jazz Foundation
7:00 PM to 9:00 PM
rehearsal at the Center for the Arts.
Community
Volunteer Day at Habitatv
9:00 AM to 4:30 PM
at Hall Street job site in east Jackson.
Classes & Lectures
Free Weekly Knitting Help!
11:30 AM
Knit on Pearl in Jackson, WY
Community
Teton County Roundtable Program
11:45 AM to 1:00 PM
at the First Interstate Bank’s training room, located at 802 West Broadway.
Music
Liatt Potter & Dan Mihlfeith
5:00 PM to 8:00 PM
in the Lobby Lounge of Four Seasons Resort.
Classes & Lectures
Foreign Policy Series: Cybersecurity
6:00 PM
at County Commissioners Chamber, 200 S. Willow Street.
Music
Plum Tuckered Out
6:30 PM
at Cafe Genevieve.
Music
Plum Tuckered Out
6:30 PM
at Cafe Genevieve.
Music
Live in the Hole: Off Square Theatre
6:30 PM to 7:00 PM
on 89.1 FM, KHOL.
Music
Buol Heslin
7:00 PM to 9:00 PM
at Alpine Wines in Driggs.
Outdoors
Wyoming Native Plant Society Presents
7:00 PM
at Wyoming Game and Fish, 420 N. Cache.
Music
Sweethogs and Swinehearts Ball
9:00 PM
at the Mangy Moose in Teton Village.
View All Events
planet polls
JH Weekly Poll
Who do you think should pay for the health care of Aaron Wallis?



Total of voters : 74